M45 links intent to requirements to design to verification. And keeps that link current. Drift gets caught early, not at certification.
Inferred Intent
“System shall not initiate automatic recovery while pilot maintains active stick input”
Linked Requirements
Gap
No requirement governs interaction between active pilot input and auto-recovery trigger.
Found before certification review
“A shocking amount comes from PowerPoint. PowerPoint engineering has become a bad habit.”
Systems engineer, aircraft OEM
“At a certain point, it was about 80% just paperwork and 20% really progress.”
Systems engineer, defense aerospace
Requirements in one place. Design in another. Decisions somewhere else. The connections break quietly as the system evolves. Misalignment costs 10× more at every stage it escapes.
What the system is supposed to achieve
Formal requirements and architecture
Code, hardware, test infrastructure
Validation, certification, in use
Cost to fix misalignment at each stage
M45 reads your artifacts and infers structure: functions, components, modes, scenarios. It maps how they connect. When something changes, it shows what else is affected.
You validate. You decide. M45 remembers the reasoning.
Your system at a glance. Functions, components, modes, scenarios. Structured and connected. Click any element to trace back to source.
GNSS Spoofing Suspected
System monitors GNSS signal authenticity and flags anomalies indicating potential spoofing.
Protected Mode Activation
When spoofing suspected, device enters protected mode limiting GNSS reliance.
System Profile
This appears to be a system for providing reliable navigation and altitude information for aircraft. Its main responsibilities are assessing GNSS authenticity and fusing GNSS with onboard sensor data.
The system includes a GNSS receiver, an inertial navigation unit, a barometric altitude sensor, and an air data computer. A dedicated spoofing detection engine monitors signal authenticity.
It operates in GNSS, navigation, altitude, protected, and alert modes. It outputs fused position, velocity, and altitude data.
Generates a plain-language summary of the system. What it does. How it works. In paragraphs, not spreadsheets.
Flags requirements that are ambiguous, duplicated, or say two things at once. Before they reach review.
Combines fusing GNSS with other sensors and the constraint of a configurable time window in one sentence.
Runs in our cloud or yours. Self-hosted available for regulated programs.
Two input modes feed a shared context graph. Workflows query it. Engineers approve every output.
Currently in use with early design partners.
Pull
Engineer-initiated ingestion
Monitor
Event-driven detection
Engineering Context Graph
Persistent shared state connecting all layers
Workflows
Every workflow is human-gated. Nothing ships without engineer approval.
Intent Review
Requirements decompose through multiple tiers, from aircraft functions down to component specs. Intent Review surfaces where engineering intent got lost or distorted in that translation.
Learn more →Requirements Decomposition
Starting from system-level intent, this workflow helps you author lower-tier requirements while preserving traceability and safety context. Intent Review audits existing specs; this one creates new ones.
Compliance Scout
Certification frameworks like DO-178C and ARP4754A define hundreds of objectives. Compliance Scout maps your engineering artifacts against those objectives and surfaces gaps before formal review.
Safety Case Assembly
A safety case connects STPA analyses, requirements, and structured arguments into a coherent whole. This workflow builds those connections systematically instead of manually chasing links across documents.
Context Bridge
Every buyer has their own format conventions, attribute schemas, and structural expectations. Suppliers must adapt to each one; buyers must interpret what arrives. Context Bridge handles that mapping on both sides.
Regulatory Change Impact
When a standard or regulation changes, impact ripples through requirements, arguments, and tests. This workflow traces that impact across programs so nothing gets missed.
Workflow outputs
We're partnering with systems engineering teams to shape the roadmap. Early access, direct input.
Building the wrong thing perfectly
is the most expensive mistake.